follow us:

CLOUD Standards

When Standards Interact: A CLOUD-Inspired Future for XBRL

During a recent trip to Seattle, I had the pleasure of sitting down for lunch with Charlie Hoffman, father of XBRLPaul Wilkinson, Chief Strategy Officer for CLOUD and former Sr. Adviser to Chairman Cox at the SEC, had introduced us, and we’ve had a few good phone conversations over the past year about CLOUD and XBRL.

During our lunch, Charlie had an interesting reaction to CLOUD, describing it as the “logical model for the semantic web.”  That lunch conversation, plus my reading of his and Liv Watson’s excellent book, “XBRL for Dummies,” have sparked some interesting thoughts about ways in which CLOUD and XBRL might interact in practical ways.

With all the discussion over transparency, open government and “government” data, it seemed like an interesting example could be culled from current places in which XBRL is already being used: public filings.  Of course, the very fact that a verb like “filed” is used to describe the process tells me that even without CLOUD, XBRL is not meeting its full potential.  If I understand the process for SEC filings in XBRL correctly, a public company still “sends” or “files” their XBRL Instance to the SEC, so as to meet their filing requirements.  In the world of the Internet, this makes no sense to me at all.  If we had to “send” HTML documents around the Internet, the Web would never have taken off!

That being said, I will move on…  The example that follows will highlight how XBRL-wrapped data, further empowered by a contextual set of CLOUD tags, could create a more dynamic and secure process.   Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,

The WSJ’s Privacy Debate: Moving Beyond the False Trade-Off

This past weekend, the Wall Street Journal published two more thoughtful columns in their series on privacy.  Nicholas Carr “penned” an excellent piece titled, “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty, With Real Dangers,” and Jim Harper penned an equally compelling column, “It’s Modern Trade: Web Users Get as Much as They Give.”

In a weird twist of political philosophy on privacy and liberty, I agree and disagree with them both.  However, I disagree not because Nicholas and Jim are wrong, but because I do not believe that we must accept the assumptions behind their arguments.   Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,

Asset-Backed Securities: Python/XML/XBRL & The Question of Languages

Over the past couple of weeks, an interesting debate has unfolded around the SEC’s proposed rule to increase investor protections in asset-backed securities. My friend and CLOUD colleague, Paul Wilkinson, forwarded the proposed rule to me while I was in Europe for the Health 2.0 conference in Paris, a trip from which I returned just two days prior to the volcano in Iceland spewing its ash into European airspace!

Following the Health 2.0 Conference on April 6 and 7 and meetings with the innovation leadership at SWIFT on April 8 in Brussels, my wife and I enjoyed some time with her family in Belgium before returning home.  It was during this time with family that an interesting conversation unfolded over a delicious lunch in the countryside west of Brussels that unexpectedly yielded some intriguing historical insights into language and access.

My wife’s aunt lives in a beautiful old farmhouse that has been renovated several times over its life.  One of those renovations is a truly special library (populated with many, many antique books by her now deceased uncle and former justice on the Belgian Court of Appeals). Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,

A SWIFT View of an “Identity Rights System 3.0″

Although I might quibble with the idea that CLOUD’s vision is limited to identity rights, Peter Vander Auwera, Innovation Leader at SWIFT and member of Innotribe, has posted quite a compelling overview of eIDs.  With the start of the European eID Interoperability Conference 2010 this week, his Identity Rights System 3.0 post is a timely review of where we have been with privacy and identity rights.  It is worth a full read, as are all of his posts at his personal blog.

Although Google Buzz has fixed its highly visible privacy flaw that occurred at launch, this episode is another indication that privacy must be woven into the fabric of the Internet, rather than a term of service by vendors.  The challenge ahead of us is not just a technological one but a philosophical one.  At its heart, the question is “who owns ME?”  CLOUD’s goal is to build the technology architecture that makes it possible for us to have “Local Ownership and Use of Data.”

Peter at SWIFT does a brilliant job of explaining how and why this is different than the eID movement and how CLOUD can propel all of these efforts forward by ushering in a new era of ME 1.0.

Tags: , , ,

Cerf has the question… CLOUD has the answer

Cerf urges standards for cloud computing

In this recent Infoworld article, Vint Cerf, as always, asks the right question. The answer to his question is to return to the basics of the Internet that he created. The “inter-cloud” problem he described most recently at the Churchill Club stems from popular acceptance of HTML 15 years ago. While HTML sparked an Internet boom, it made people look at the Internet as a way to connect Web pages, not people.

Securing user data scattered among large numbers of Web silos is complex and consumes huge amounts of every users’ most valuable resource: time. The solution isn’t another identity standard or method for data portability. It’s a paradigm shift.

CLOUD’s technology standard is that shift. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,

Is Privacy a Uniquely Facebook Issue?

The past few days have seen a renewal of the conversation about privacy on Facebook. Articles of note include Privacy Advocates Slam Facebook Change and How Facebook is Making Friending Obsolete.

Protecting privacy isn’t a challenge unique to Facebook. It was around long before the invention of HTML and Web sites 15 years ago, but those developments made the challenge acute. The pre-Web Internet was about connecting people directly, but the Web caused a reversion to publishing and broadcasting models. The Web and HTML have contributed to the growth of the Internet, but their main side effect has been to force us into silos to connect with each other. Facebook, with 350 million users, is one impressive silo, but more than 1.7 billion Internet users are spread among millions of other silos.

So, what does this mean for privacy? Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,

CLOUD Transcends Net Neutrality

Internet Renaissance Man Gordon Crovitz posits in his latest Wall Street Journal column, “Will the Internet Survive its 40th?” that it’s sometimes “wiser for mortals to stand aside and leave technology to advance at its own pace. After its first 40 years delivering freedom and abundance, the Web has earned the benefit of the doubt.”

CLOUD doesn’t take positions on legislation and regulation like “net neutrality,” but it agrees about the power of technology.

The power of the Internet comes from connecting people and democratizing access to content and conversations. Unfortunately, the importance of users isn’t fully considered in pending net neutrality legislation or Federal Communications Commission regulatory proposals. Users simply aren’t seen as potential participants in the ultimate decisions of legislators or regulators.

In any event, using technology like CLOUD’s Context Markup Language (CTML) to empower individuals to find the right balance of price, speed, and capacity for themselves will ultimately make the entire net neutrality debate obsolete.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,

The Power of Standards. A View from the Economist.

In a story that remains free notwithstanding the magazine’s recent movement of more content behind a pay wall, the brand new Economist takes an overview of cloud computing. It gets right to the point:

A storm brewing?
First is the familiar risk of technological lock-in, as rival companies promote their own, mutually incompatible, standards and formats, as they have done in the past.

CLOUD intends to solve that problem for information about you. What better way to avoid technological lock-in for Internet users than to create a multi-industry standard computing language that puts people back in charge of their own information? Turns out this approach addresses the Economist’s second and third concerns — privacy and security — too.

Tags: , , , , ,